boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11

#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 activation code
#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 code
#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 simulator

The main purpose of 10.30 has nothing to do with the flight model but with some changes for their maps and graphics systems. This is probably due to the fact that you can't directly modify the weight of each section of the plane, for example passengers and cargo.Įither you know something about 10.30 that we don't or you are wrong. One major noticeable thing is the fixed CG on the FF so you'll always end up with the same trim settings because of this. I'll admit I'm not well versed in the scientific aspects of flight modelling particularly FBW but understand there are 3 laws that operate this in the 777 and in the FF it seems like they tried to implement some kind of FBW simulation but just doesn't 'feel' right (difficult to explain as not my background). I personally find that when hand flying the FF it feels a bit 'unwieldy' especially during the initial climb out where it seems difficult to keep the pitch stable even with the proper trim setting (which again is calculated completely differently from the PMDG). Hi jcomm, sorry but do you mean the flight system laws on the FF aren't correctly simulated? None of the 3 flight system laws are correctly simulated. On the contrary, most certainly they had to 'tweak' and tune lots of parameters to get it right, maybe not less than the best X-Plane aircraft designers do with their models.īut unfortunately not realistic. Infact, I'm sure that DCS developers didn't just put in the 3d shape and engine data of the P51, and voilà, out came a perfectly realistic P51 flight model. More importantly, I don't think DCS flight model is a 'magic bullet', so even if they'd make it openly accessible, I doubt we'd see a sudden blast of new aircrafts with super-realistic flight models. My _personal_ opinion based on that, is that the difference in complexity between the two flight models is not enormous, even if DCS could be somewhat more complex and/or accurate. That is exactly the article I was referring to, the paragraph titled 'Advanced Flight Model' is very interesting to read.įrom the descriptions given, the approach used by DCS is very similar to X-Plane.

#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 simulator

Maybe one day we will have a simulator as open as FSX and X-Plane with such advanced FM to allow people to make all the stuff they want. It's like a secret they keep to the most talented groups to create approved addons, not for everyone to access and tweak. One thing I remember reading is that very few people has access to the Advanced Flight Model within DCS. This Article, brought to this forum by Jcomm I believe, is very good to read and get to know the truth behind all the myths about FM that has been circulating the internet for years. That being said, of course this does mean that any 'Blade Element'-like simulator is better than a 'look-up tables' one. Maybe you don't see any real advantages and that is fine, but the developers of those flight sims do!

#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 code

After all, a 'look-up tables' FM would be far easier to code and aircrafts easier to design, so there must be a valid reason why they did not choose to do so. In a post by Jcomm some days ago, there was a link to a long post of one of the developers of DCS, very interesting to read, and he precisely said that they went to a 'Blade Element'-like flight model (instead of a pure 'look-up tables' FM) exactly because it was the only way in which they could get that additional edge in the flight model feeling and realism.Īgain, it's not by chance that simulators that gave top priority to flight model feeling and realism, like Condor Soaring, Silent Wings, DCS, Flight Unlimited (at the time), make all use of a 'Blade Element'-like flight model. BTW- this statement won't exactly apply to helicopters. When getting out of the normal flight envelope, it's up to the programmer to supply additional information.for the sake of realism. For example, delete 777-300ER.afc, and keep 777-300ER._ my book, as a long time real life GA flyer.I don't see any real advantages between look up tables and other methods, such as blade element. acf files that dont have 'x plane 11' in the name, then x plane will use the x plane. acf files of all the aircraft (777-f, 777-200 etc), if you delete the. I've found a way to fix it, if you go into the FF777 Extended directory, you will see. says that the acf file is incompatible with X plane 11 Thanks to anyone that shares their copy and bless your soul <3

#Boeing 777 worldliner professional x plane 11 activation code

I guess if the activation code is exclusive and has limited use & it may not be possible to that i understand. I've seen the other links to grab the out of date versions (v1.9.9 & v1.9.12) which seems to be buggy and crashed my XPlane. Just the 200ER v1.9.15 Im not going to see work till September so i cant even afford that right now.